12/15/2023 0 Comments Handbrake mp4 to hevcDoes away with pretty much all color banding issues and masks video artifacts better in general. Pros: Even better compression than H265 8bit without loosing quality, usually 5-7%. ![]() It's also known as H265 Main10, and it's known for its higher fidelity. It still has some of that H264 color banding issues well. Compared to H264, same files with same settings will take upwards of 3 times longer to compress with single pass compression, and upwards of 5 times longer with dual pass compression. Because of smaller size, it is suitable for use cases like 4K media and above.Ĭons: Needs dedicated hardware to run (all chips that came out in the last few years support it) and is quite a bit more expensive to compress resource wise. Pros: Much higher compression capability than H264, upwards of 2.5x smaller file sizes for equal quality compared to H264. It is a successor to all previously mentioned codecs. H265 (8bit): Released in 2013, also known as High Efficiency Video Codec, or HEVC for short. You'll usually see sizes upwards of 15GB though. For a 2 hour 1080p movie, a good H264 encode needs at least 10GB to produce good results. Gets really blocky in lower bitrates, does not do well with color banding. It is also very quick to compress.Ĭons: Needs quite a bit of bitrate by today's standards to produce watchable content. Pros: Really easy to run, has decent enough compression for use cases up to 1080p and was (at the time of release) more than twice as efficient as the older MPEG2 standard. H264: Released in 2003, replaced MPEG2, H263 and MPEG4 part 10. So - here is the 3 codecs explained in laymen's terms, and a few HandBrake settings that might be useful. ![]() Today, I will tackle a topic that seems to elude common forums such that if one needs all the information in one place, there usually isn't one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |